<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tfheen@varnish-software.com">tfheen@varnish-software.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

]] Kristian Lyngstol<br>
<div class="im"><br>
| Personally, I'm leaning towards keeping the curent behavior, but it's a<br>
| topic of frequent debate. It's very common to distinguish between<br>
| web-clients and the reverse proxy - ideally we'd want our own set of<br>
| headers...<br>
<br>
</div>This sounds very much like what Surrogate-Control was designed for.  Not<br>
that it has seen much uptake, though.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wow, I wish I had known about <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">Surrogate-Control before inventing X-Cache-Alternate for internal use in my organization.</span></div>

<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">It would probably catch on if Varnish was the reference implementation.</span></div>

<meta charset="utf-8"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
--<br>
Tollef Fog Heen<br>
Varnish Software<br>
t: +47 21 98 92 64<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
varnish-misc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org">varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc" target="_blank">http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jacob Elder<div><div>@jelder</div><div>(646) 535-3379</div><div><br></div></div><br>