[varnish] Re: Cacheability - changed in Varnish 2?

Ricardo Newbery ric at digitalmarbles.com
Thu Jan 29 11:55:19 CET 2009

On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <49818470.10606 at giraffen.dk>, Anton Stonor writes:
>> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> I hope we don't ship varnish that way on any platforms, the default
>>> ttl should be 120 seconds...
>> No, the "0" default ttl comes from this one:
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.recipe.varnish
>> From the changelog: "Add a default_ttl of zero seconds to the Varnish
>> runner to avoid a Varnish bug with the handling of an Expires header
>> with a date in the past."
> That's been fixed, but I can't remember if it made it back to 2.0.x

Ahh, cool.  Fixed starting with which version?


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list